For research and information-retrieval evaluation only. Not a medical device. Not for diagnosis, treatment, or patient care.

Results

Benchmark leaderboard

Retrieval metrics across 35 gold-bearing tasks (v1, 45-task set). Every comparative claim below is bootstrap-tested — the significance badge is load-bearing, not decorative.

Retrieval metrics by retriever

RetrieverRecall@5Recall@10MRRnDCG@10Success@5
BM250.4050.6430.4980.4550.743
Dense0.5260.7690.4720.5100.771
Hybrid0.5100.7330.5150.5090.800

n = 35 tasks with gold evidence, v1 corpus (832 docs, 35 diseases).

Reranking effect

Cross-encoder reranking (ms-marco-MiniLM-L-6-v2) applied on top of hybrid first-stage retrieval. The first-stage recall ceiling is the hard limit reranking cannot exceed — evidence the first stage never surfaces in its top-20 pool can’t be recovered downstream.

Recall@5
0.636
Recall@10
0.848
MRR
0.613
nDCG@10
0.621
First-stage recall ceiling @20
0.890

n = 35 tasks. ~11% of gold evidence is never retrieved by hybrid at all within the top 20 — no reranker can recover it.

Bootstrap significance tests

Paired bootstrap over the 35-task set, 95% confidence intervals. A CI that includes zero means the observed difference is not distinguishable from sampling noise at this scale — it is reported honestly as inconclusive, not as a win for either side.

ComparisonMetricMean diff95% CInResult
hybrid vs denseRecall@10-0.036[-0.114, 0.038]35Not distinguishable from noise
hybrid vs bm25Recall@10+0.090[0.007, 0.186]3595% CI excludes zero
hybrid vs densenDCG@10-0.001[-0.050, 0.048]35Not distinguishable from noise
hybrid vs bm25nDCG@10+0.054[-0.008, 0.115]35Not distinguishable from noise
hybrid vs denseMRR+0.043[-0.036, 0.130]35Not distinguishable from noise
hybrid vs bm25MRR+0.017[-0.080, 0.113]35Not distinguishable from noise
reranked vs pre-rerank hybridRecall@10+0.114[0.048, 0.190]3595% CI excludes zero

2 of 7 comparisons exclude zero at 95% CI. Per claims_registry.md C-019: this supersedes the confidence level of the earlier v0-scale numbers, which were all null (C-012) at n=18.

Figure

Retrieval comparison across BM25, dense, and hybrid retrievers
Retrieval comparison — BM25 vs. dense vs. hybrid, by metric. See /retrieval for the reranking figure and a deeper per-retriever analysis.